PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Chiasmi International » Submission Guidelines

Chiasmi International

INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS

A peer-reviewed academic journal, Chiasmi International publishes original research on or inspired by the thought of the French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty. The journal welcomes submissions in English, French, or Italian. All submissions are blind refereed.

General Guidelines

Articles

In preparing your manuscript for submission, please:

  • Include author’s name and institutional affiliation with the title on a separate cover page to facilitate blind review.

  • Include as a separate file an abstract of 100-250 words in the language of the submission. The abstract will be translated into the journal's other two official languages.

  • Include references to the original French editions of Merleau-Ponty's works, rather than only to English or Italian translations.

  • Double-space and use Times New Roman, 12 point font.

  • Use endnotes rather than footnotes.

Manuscripts should be submitted by email in Word format (.doc or .rtf)mat) to one of the following editors:

Mauro Carbone
Email: [email protected]

Ted Toadvine
Email: [email protected]

Book Reviews

Chiasmi International publishes both invited and submitted reviews. Publishers are invited to submit print copies of books for review. Suggestions for books to be reviewed should be sent to one of the following editors:

ITALIAN TEXTS
Federico Leoni
Via Piero della Francesca 38
20154 Milano – Italia
Email: [email protected]

FRENCH TEXTS
Mauro Carbone
Faculté de Philosophie
Université Jean-Moulin Lyon 3
1, rue de l'Université BP 0638
69239 Lyon Cedex 02 – France
Email: [email protected]

ENGLISH TEXTS
Galen A. Johnson
95 Spring Hill Rd.
Kingston, RI 02881 – USA
Email: [email protected]

Publication Ethics Statement

The editorial team of Chiasmi International is committed to ensuring the integrity of the publication process by upholding the Code of Conduct of the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE). Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

Authors

Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors

Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the paper

Overview
Free Content
Editorial Team
Browse Contents
Get current table of contents via RSSRSS Feeds
Email UpdatesE-mail Updates
Find us on facebook
Series Volumes
About the Society
Indexing / Abstracting
Submission Guidelines
Rights & Permissions

For Subscribers:
Access this publication
Current print issues
Change Address
Renew