Business and Professional Ethics Journal
The BPEJ strives to broaden the scope of philosophical analysis within business and professional ethics scholarship. The editors welcome submissions from many disciplines - including management and organization studies, philosophy, political economics, social psychology, sociology, religious studies, history, and anthropology - to encourage research into the interaction between individuals, organizations and the socio-political and economic realities of which they are a part.
Accordingly, the journal is open to a range of methodological approaches. From an empirical perspective, it invites scholarship informed by ethnography and other qualitative research methodologies. It specifically seek papers that explore the implications of continental philosophy for organizational life, while also pursuing original research from the perspective of Anglo-American philosophy. All submissions that explore the many practical implications of the interface(s) between business ethics and professional ethics are welcomed.
Authors should submit manuscripts online through the journal's ScholarOne manuscript submission site:
A complete submission includes a cover letter and appropriately formatted original manuscript (see format information below). Manuscript files should be in Word 2007 format. The cover letter should include:
- Author(s) names and institutional affiliations
- Contact information for one author, including at least email address and telephone number
- Confirmation that the manuscript is not currently under consideration by any other publication
Questions about submission procedure should be addressed to the editorial office at [email protected].
- Manuscripts shall be original, unpublished works and may not be under consideration at another publication.
- Since a double blind review process is used, no authors’ name should appear anywhere on the manuscript. In addition, because we share files electronically, it is the authors’ responsibility to strip the file of any other identifying notations, including references in the document’s properties, title, or first-person language in text of references.
- Though the BPEJ enthusiastically encourages submissions across disciplines, submitted manuscripts must be in a condition ready for publication according to The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition. Given the variety of disciplines from which our submissions may originate, the BPEJ accepts contributions using either the Chicago Manual “author-date” or “notes-bibliography” formats. A helpful resource on The Chicago Manual of Style is available online here.
- If using the author-date system of citation for references in the text, footnotes also may be used for substantive information inappropriate for inclusion in the body of an article. However, authors are encouraged to incorporate information in the text where possible.
- Please do not submit manuscripts with coding from bibliographic software like EndNote and Reference Manager.
- Because BPEJ is a cross-disciplinary journal, articles that adopt a style that is accessible to colleagues from other disciplines, while retaining their academic sophistication, are particularly appreciated. With this in mind, authors should provide: (a) indicative titling/subtitling; (b) descriptive abstracts, (c) exceptional clarity through structure, format, and the use of subheads.
- Each submitted manuscript should include a brief abstract (150 words or less).
- Manuscripts should be double-spaced with 1" margins on all sides using 12 pt. Times New Roman or similar font.
- All pages should be numbered.
- Authors should indent new paragraphs rather than include an extra line between them, and should differentiate major and minor headings.
- Authors should avoid the use of first person where possible, though some use (such as “we contend”) is understandable
- Please use italics or quotes for emphasis very sparingly.
- Numbers less than 100 should be spelled out, unless they are a percentage (e.g. 5 percent)
- All tables, figures or other graphics should appear at the end of the article and be included in the same file. If this is not possible then we need the original file used to produce the figure or graph.
- It is the authors’ responsibility to obtain any necessary permission for use of copyrighted material contained within the article.
Publications Ethics Statement
The editorial team of the Business and Professional Ethics Journal is committed to ensuring the integrity of the publication process. Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers must treat received manuscripts as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the paper.