PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly

Volume 77, Issue 3, Summer 2003

Brendan Sweetman
Pages 417-436
DOI: 10.5840/acpq200377321

Commitment, Justification, and the Rejection of Natural Theology

This paper considers two related claims in the work of D. Z. Phillips: that commitment to God precludes a distinction between the commitment and the grounds for the commitment, and that belief and understanding are the same in religion. Both these claims motivate Phillips’s rejection of natural theology. I examine these claims by analyzing the notion of commitment, discussing what is involved in making a commitment to a worldview, why commitment is necessary at all in religion, levels of commitment, and commitment and justification. I show that Phillips fails to distinguish between adopting a hypothesis, where justification would be germane, and committing to the hypothesis after one has adopted it, where justification is not so pressing. This failure fatally undermines his rejection of natural theology.

Usage and Metrics
Dimensions
PDC