PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association

ONLINE FIRST

published on November 22, 2016

Peter Karl Koritansky
DOI: 10.5840/acpaproc2016112150

A Thomistic Analysis of the Hart-Fuller Debate

In 1958, the Harvard Law Review published a now-famous debate between H. L. A. Hart and Lon Fuller regarding the proposed connection between law and morality. Whereas Hart defended a broadly positivist conception of law, Fuller advanced a kind of natural law theory that has greatly influenced judicial interpretation in the United States. This paper examines the debate and provides a commentary in light of the natural law theory of Thomas Aquinas. Whereas it is not surprising that Aquinas would reject the central tenets of Hart’s positivism, it also appears he would have deep misgivings about the position defended by Professor Fuller, and particularly Fuller’s understanding of how laws should be interpreted in light of morality.