|
comments |
|
1.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Anne-Marie Bowery, Comments on Sarah E. Worth’s “Fact, Fiction, or Fraud”
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Scott Aikin, Invariantism, Skepticism, and Two Senses of Pragmatism:
A Comment on Eric Thompson
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Candice Shelby, Reply to Goldberg’s “Van Inwagen’s Two Failed Arguments for the Belief in Freedom”
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Alastair Norcross, Why Legitimacy Doesn’t Entail Obligation:
A Response to Wyckoff
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Dave Beisecker, Corporations Behaving Badly:
Commentary for Kendy Hess’s “The Modern Corporation as Moral Agent”
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Julie Kuhlken, Extending Extensionist Environmental Virtue Ethics
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Jonathan Parker, Comments on William Grove-Fanning’s “Biodiversity Loss, the Motivational Gap, and the Failure of Conservation Education”
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Richard Galvin, Should Kantians Be Willing to Embrace “Universally Lawful Willing” as a Good Will’s Fundamental Principle?
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Cynthia Gayman, What is Goldilocks’ Problem? A Response to “Ethical Progress and the Goldilocks Problem: Objectivity and the Radical Revision of Values” by Amanda Roth
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume >
26 >
Issue: 2
Stuart Rosenbaum, Butterfield on Dewey’s Idea of Democracy
view |
rights & permissions
|
|
|
|
