>> Go to Current Issue

Faith and Philosophy

Volume 28, Issue 4, October 2011

Already a subscriber? Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-10 of 14 documents


articles
1. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Kenneth Boyce, Non-Moral Evil and the Free Will Defense
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Paradigmatic examples of logical arguments from evil are attempts to establish that the following claims are inconsistent with one another: (1) God is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good. (2) There is evil in the world. Alvin Plantinga’s free will defense resists such arguments by providing a positive case that (1) and (2) are consistent. A weakness in Plantinga’s free will defense, however, is that it does not show that theism is consistent with the proposition that there are non-moral evils in the world (i.e., that there obtain morally bad states of affairs for which no creature is morally responsible). But many of us firmly believe that there are evils of that sort. I show how Plantinga’s free will defense can be extended so as to redress this weakness.
2. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Joseph Corabi, Eschatological Cutoffs
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Recently, there have been a number of responses to Ted Sider’s argument in “Hell and Vagueness,” which challenges the consistency of a popular view of hell with God’s justice. After presenting an interpretation of the original argument, I critically examine the reply to it by Trent Dougherty and Ted Poston. I conclude that we should be suspicious of the success of their overall approach, both because it requires the truth of controversial metaphysical theses and because it does not ultimately address the heart of the worry that Sider’s argument is built on. Ultimately, I present and offer a limited defense of a new response to Sider, built on a picture of consignment to hell based on having committed mortal sins that are unforgiven by God.
3. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Katherin A. Rogers, Anselm Against McCann On God and Sin: Further Discussion
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Hugh McCann argues that God wills human sin, that humans are nonetheless significantly free, and that his position provides a satisfying theodicy of sin. I defend an Anselmian view: Although God causes the existence of all that exists, He does not produce sin. Human beings are the ultimate sources of their sinning, which sinning should not happen. McCann rejoins that my position is incoherent and that my criticisms are not well taken. I respond, clarifying Anselm’s understanding of human freedom, revisiting and defending my previous criticisms, and arguing that in practice McCann’s position is a poor fit for the Christian life.
4. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Steven B. Cowan, Compatibilism and the Sinlessness of the Redeemed in Heaven
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In a recent issue of Faith and Philosophy, Timothy Pawl and Kevin Timpe seek to respond to the so-called “Problem of Heavenly Freedom,” the problem ofexplaining how the redeemed in heaven can be free yet incapable of sinning. In the course of offering their solution, they argue that compatibilism is inadequateas a solution because it (1) undermines the free will defense against the logical problem of evil, and (2) exacerbates the problem of evil by making God the “author of sin.” In this paper, I respond to these charges and argue that compatibilism can offer a satisfactory explanation for the sinlessness of the redeemed in heaven. I also raise some problems for Pawl’s and Timpe’s incompatibilist solution.
review essay
5. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
William Hasker, Light in the Darkness? Reflections on Eleonore Stump’s Theodicy
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Eleonore Stump’s Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering is a major contribution to the literature on the problem of evil. This reviewessay summarizes the overall argument of the book, pointing out both merits and difficulties with Stump’s approach. In particular, the essay urges objectionsto the solution she presents for the problem of suffering.
reviews
6. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Greg Welty, The Metaphysics of Perfect Beings
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
7. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Hugh J. McCann, Anselm on Freedom
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Paul J. Griffiths, Living Forms of the Imagination
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Jacqueline Mariña, Is God a Delusion? A Reply to Religion’s Cultured Despisers
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. Faith and Philosophy: Volume > 28 > Issue: 4
Dale Jacquette, A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley
view |  rights & permissions | cited by